<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Selective denial of public gatherings at Ijok undermines human rights</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.bangkit.net/2007/04/25/selective-denial-of-public-gatherings-at-ijok-undermines-human-rights/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.bangkit.net/2007/04/25/selective-denial-of-public-gatherings-at-ijok-undermines-human-rights/</link>
	<description>participate, cooperate, activate!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 27 Mar 2009 13:54:40 +0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Huang Siew Hock</title>
		<link>http://www.bangkit.net/2007/04/25/selective-denial-of-public-gatherings-at-ijok-undermines-human-rights/comment-page-1/#comment-8005</link>
		<dc:creator>Huang Siew Hock</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Apr 2007 15:37:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bangkit.net/2007/04/25/selective-denial-of-public-gatherings-at-ijok-undermines-human-rights/#comment-8005</guid>
		<description>Fundamental issues are in question.

Freedom of speech; freedom of association; freedom of movement; freedom to attend or not to attend meetings, especially in an election like the one at Ijok.

These freedoms are enshrined in the Federal Constitution  and also in the United Nations  Human Rights. These are basic rights  of every individual; and the defenders of such rights should uphold them at all times and in all places, without fear or favour.

The Election Commission must  uphold and  enforce such rights. The EC is supposed to be an impartial referee and  must see to it that the rules of fair play are strictly enforced. It must be seen to hold the  scales  of justice&#039; and  blow the whistle  when any infringement of such rights occurs. It must not close one eye  when there is any foul play.It must keep both eyes open and act swiftly and firmly wherever  any infringement takes place.

The  rule of law must always prevail. Has the EC acted in like manner ? Let right-thinking  people  decide  for themselves whether  it  is so .

malaysia08</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fundamental issues are in question.</p>
<p>Freedom of speech; freedom of association; freedom of movement; freedom to attend or not to attend meetings, especially in an election like the one at Ijok.</p>
<p>These freedoms are enshrined in the Federal Constitution  and also in the United Nations  Human Rights. These are basic rights  of every individual; and the defenders of such rights should uphold them at all times and in all places, without fear or favour.</p>
<p>The Election Commission must  uphold and  enforce such rights. The EC is supposed to be an impartial referee and  must see to it that the rules of fair play are strictly enforced. It must be seen to hold the  scales  of justice&#8217; and  blow the whistle  when any infringement of such rights occurs. It must not close one eye  when there is any foul play.It must keep both eyes open and act swiftly and firmly wherever  any infringement takes place.</p>
<p>The  rule of law must always prevail. Has the EC acted in like manner ? Let right-thinking  people  decide  for themselves whether  it  is so .</p>
<p>malaysia08</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.128 seconds -->
